"Pinkification of Womanly Consumption" is the phrase I have been looking for

Maybe you have read my numerous posts and beefs about pink, pinkification, pink ribboning, and pink marketing. My distaste is quite apparent.

Today I read a piece in the Globe and Mail that wasn't really about pink ribbon marketing specifically, but about the "pinkification of womanly consumption" more generally. That is the phrase I have been looking for: "the pinkification of womanly consumption".

Katrina Onstad writes:

"When I went to replace my cellphone, the salesperson led me to a pink BlackBerry and made a Vanna White gesture that said: 'Voila! A phone for the gentler, less technicaly savvy sex!' Oh, Best Buy clerk, please help me: Which orfice do I hold it up to again?"

And:

"All of these items would probably please my six-year-old - or my inner six-year-old. But fairly or unfairly, pink - demure, unthreatening, feminine - is not really the colour of a strong, wise adulthood."

Onstad's disdain is generated by the new marketing campaign of Molson Coors' new crisp rose beer:

"Beer is brown. Apparently, this is a problem for me. It turns out that, as a woman, I require my beverages in a less threatening hue - like pink, which is the colour of a new 'crsip rose beer' launching this fall in Britian. Animee is aimed at women, and also comes in white (clear filtered) and yellow (zesty lemon), because those are the colours of spring flowers, and ladies like flowers. It's also less bloating, because ladies like skinny."

Read the full article here from the Globe and Mail. 

Tell us your thoughts about the pinkification of womanly consumption. Does it work? Outside of pink ribbon marketing, do you buy pink?

 

 

 

 


Pinkification: but is it our fault?

Loved the article and the blog. But I ask myself a painful question: if we are so outraged by this, how come most of these marketing campaigns are so darn successful? Advertisers and companies don't come out with these products unless they are SURE there is a market for them. Pink phones and beers are researched before they're manufactured/produced, there are focus groups probably with thousands of women and experiments and trials for packaging, flavour and colour. What I'm trying to say is that this pinkification doesn't take place unless there is a pre-established market for it, which means women are in some ways telling companies that this is what they want. So what's happening? Women are buying into this stuff but they're also the ones who are in some respects creating the niche market for it too otherwise companies wouldn't spend gazillions of dollars manufacturing and promoting the stuff. It's up to us not to buy it. It's up to mothers, fathers, teachers, and women themselves to be responsible for critical thinking. There are masses of women who somehow believe that this pinkification is a positive thing, otherwise they wouldn't buy the stuff. So what about them? How to convince people they are spending their own money promoting their own infantilization?

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <u> <i> <p> <br/> <br> <img>

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.